Grammatical Concordance

Step 1 — Open the Grammatical Concordance

Open Grammatical Concordance

Step 2 — Begin with one grammatical question

Do not start by trying to understand every field. Decide what you are looking for, for example:

• genitive noun forms;
• a particular verb tense/mood/voice;
• a pronoun or article construction;
• a syntactic role;
• occurrences of the same grammatical pattern in one book or author.

Step 3 — Use the search/filter controls

Use the available morphology, grammar, book/reference, lemma/form and view controls to narrow the data to the grammatical phenomenon you are studying.

Start broad, then add one filter at a time. This makes it easier to see which filter changed the result set.

Step 4 — Use “Grammar & View” deliberately

Where the interface offers Grammar & View or related view controls, choose the view that corresponds to the information you need rather than trying to display every analytical layer at once.

Step 5 — Read a result row from form to function

For each relevant occurrence, move through the evidence in this order:

1. Reference — where does it occur?
2. Greek form — what is actually written?
3. Lemma — what lexical item is it?
4. Morphology — what form is encoded?
5. Grammar/syntax — what role is assigned?
6. Context — does that analysis make sense in the verse/clause?

Step 6 — Compare occurrences, not isolated labels

The power of a concordance is comparison. Select several examples of the same construction and ask what they share and where they differ.

Worked example — a Genitive study

1. Open the Grammatical Concordance.
2. Use the available grammar/morphology filters to narrow results to Genitive forms.
3. If the result set is large, restrict it to a particular book.
4. Inspect the Greek form and morphology of representative occurrences.
5. Examine the supplied syntactic/grammatical role.
6. Open important verses in context.
7. Compare the examples with the Grammar chapter on Genitive syntax.

Important — “Source-supplied syntax”

Where syntax is identified as source-supplied, treat the label as structured research data supplied by the source. It is not a claim that GTM independently human-reviewed every individual syntactic label.

Use the labels to find and compare material; evaluate important examples in context.

Advanced/QA panels

If the application exposes consensus, triage, source-comparison, audit or other research-maintenance panels, ordinary students do not need to use them for normal grammatical study. They are advanced research/quality-control tools.

Recommended workflow

Grammar rule → Grammatical Concordance → representative verses → Interlinear → exegetical conclusion

የአማርኛ ደረጃ በደረጃ መመሪያ

1. Grammatical Concordance ይክፈቱ።
2. መጀመሪያ የሚያጠኑትን አንድ የሰዋሰው ጥያቄ ይወስኑ፤ ለምሳሌ Genitive፣ የግስ tense/mood/voice ወይም syntactic role።
3. ያሉትን morphology፣ grammar፣ book/reference፣ lemma/form እና ሌሎች filters በመጠቀም ውጤቱን ያጥቡ።
4. Grammar & View የሚለው ካለ ለጥናትዎ የሚጠቅመውን view ይምረጡ።
5. እያንዳንዱን ውጤት Reference → Greek form → Lemma → Morphology → Grammar/Syntax → Context በሚለው ቅደም ተከተል ይመልከቱ።
6. አንድ ምሳሌ ብቻ ሳይሆን ብዙ ተመሳሳይ ምሳሌዎችን ያወዳድሩ።
7. ጠቃሚ ጥቅሶችን በInterlinear ወይም በሙሉ የጥቅሱ አውድ ውስጥ ያንብቡ።

Source-supplied syntax የሚለው ሲታይ፣ የsyntax መረጃው ከምንጩ የመጣ structured research data መሆኑን ያስታውሱ። እያንዳንዱ label በGTM በተናጠል human-reviewed ነው ማለት አይደለም።