Claim gate Current curated corpus: R29 retains the R22 secure relation/intertext registries, completed R23–R27 P1/P2 triage, and R28 release-governance layer, then independently validates the fixed 24-record R12 allusion/echo corpus. Historical claim values remain preserved; effective R29 classifications are explicit overlays.
0 Direct quotation claims0 Explicit citation claims0 Probable-allusion claims0 Literary-dependence claims0 Multi-source clusters0 OT reuse hubs
R32 reader package / research-RC status Export package JSON Export open questions CSV
Historical QA remains embedded and exportable. Reader View hides those panels by default; Research Audit View restores them without modifying the underlying registries.
R33 frozen Research RC / external-review packet Open review packet Export freeze manifest Export review packet .md Reviewer response CSV Verify freeze
Freeze manifest recorded; verification not yet run in this browser.
Frozen registry manifest · R8–R31 Digests are SHA-256 over canonical JSON (sorted object keys; compact UTF-8 serialization). The aggregate digest hashes the ordered scriptId:digest ledger.
Dataset Scope Count SHA-256 canonical JSON
Change control
R33.1 frozen RC technical & publication QA Export QA report
Curated relation registry Export JSON Export CSV
R22 retains 64 curated NT verse pairs, 46 range/pericope groups, 272 secure Greek-OT quotation/reuse records, 24 graded allusion/echo records, 31 intertext clusters, and 18 repeated-source hubs. R22 adds modern-critical QA flags and issue cards without changing these underlying registries.
Pair Relation label Taxonomy family / domains Claim policy Review basis Greek evidence
Curated range / pericope registry Export JSON Export CSV
R12 retains the 46 R9 structural comparison groups containing 141 range segments. A range group sits above verse-level links and preserves whole-unit comparison without claiming that every verse inside one range corresponds directly to every verse in another.
Group Ranges Taxonomy family / domains Claim policy Editorial note
Greek OT / Swete witness registry Export JSON Export CSV
Witness policy. R22 retains the 272 source-checked Greek-OT comparison records built against Henry Barclay Swete, The Old Testament in Greek According to the Septuagint , via the OpenGreekAndLatin-derived digital corpus (CC BY-SA 4.0). Swete remains a comparison witness—not a claim that the NT writer copied this exact edition. R22 adds manuscript/source-affiliation QA precisely where one comparison witness cannot settle the textual question.
The secure OT registry now contains 272 source-checked records and the historical 277-unit benchmark is fully adjudicated. R22 does not add quotation records; it audits modern-critical questions across the existing registry. This remains a curated comparison layer, not a complete navigable Greek Old Testament. Psalm references use Greek/LXX numbering.
NT passage OT witness Claim / citation frame GTM NT excerpt Swete Greek witness Sequence evidence / note
Historical quotation benchmark adjudication closure · R21 Export JSON Export CSV
Benchmark closed, not scholarship “100% complete.” R21 has adjudicated all 277 row-level units in the historical Oxford/CCEL working benchmark. 272 units overlap secure GTM quotation/reuse records; 5 units were deliberately closed outside the secure tier after source review; 0 units remain unresolved . The resulting 98.2% secure-overlap ratio describes this historical benchmark only—it is not a probability, peer-review score, or claim that every possible NT use of Scripture has been exhausted.
27-book coverage matrix All 16 benchmark-positive NT books are now closed by secure overlap and/or explicit non-secure adjudication. The 11 books with zero rows in the historical table remain labeled benchmark zero , not “complete.” Revelation remains outside this quotation benchmark because its scriptural use is predominantly allusive and belongs chiefly to the separate allusion/cluster layers.
NT book Secure GTM records Oxford benchmark units Overlap-matched units Adjudicated non-secure Candidate gaps Overlap ratio Status
Verification queue closed · 0 unresolved units P1 = 0 · P2 = 0. “Closed” means each historical benchmark association has received an explicit evidential disposition. It does not convert the five non-secure adjudications into quotations and does not collapse the separate R12 allusion/echo layer into the secure registry.
Priority Book Candidate gap units Unmatched NT benchmark references
R18 final P1 adjudication log · 12 benchmark units Export JSON Export CSV
Book NT reference Historical OT target Outcome Secure record / handoff Rationale
R19 Matthew + John P2 adjudication log · 34 benchmark units Export JSON Export CSV
Book NT reference Historical OT target Outcome Secure record(s) Rationale
R20 Acts + Romans P2 adjudication log · 33 benchmark units Export JSON Export CSV
Book NT reference Historical OT target Outcome Secure record(s) Rationale
R21 final P2 adjudication log · 25 benchmark units Export JSON Export CSV
25/25 units are securely represented through 27 source records . Ephesians 6:2–3 keeps Exodus 20:12 and Deuteronomy 5:16 separate; Hebrews 13:5 keeps Joshua 1:5 and Deuteronomy 31:6 separate. Digital-witness problems in Genesis 22:17, Isaiah 35:3, and Exodus 20 are disclosed rather than silently repaired.
Book NT reference Historical OT target Outcome Secure record(s) Rationale
Modern scholarly intertextual audit · R22 retained Export audit JSON Export cases CSV
Audit scope, not claim inflation. The historical quotation benchmark is closed, but modern intertextual work still requires separate judgments about quotation boundaries, exact source-text affiliation, composite citations, witness/transcription problems, attribution, and allusion/echo status. R22 therefore adds review flags and bibliography-backed issue cards without changing any underlying secure quotation/reuse or R12 allusion/echo grade.
Methodological controls / modern research anchors
Curated modern-critical issue cases All issue categories All dispositions Open Priority Review Retain Closed
NT unit Issue category Modern status Underlying records Question R22 disposition / next action Research anchor
Automated attention queue · secure registry Export queue CSV
This queue is rule-based QA only. P1 means a record carries a witness/source/text-form/composite flag; P2 means a quotation/reuse boundary deserves review. Neither band is a confidence score or an adverse scholarly judgment.
All attention flags All priorities P1 · text/source P2 · claim boundary
Priority Record NT passage OT witness Claim Flags Current affiliation note
Five historical benchmark controls deliberately kept outside the secure registry These closed controls guard against “benchmark completion” pressure turning paraphrase, allusion, thematic association, or weak historical linkage into quotation.
NT passage Historical OT target Disposition Rationale
P1 Text/Source Triage I · R23 Export triage JSON Export triage CSV
Controlled tranche, not registry expansion. R23 reviews the 10 records carrying the R22 text-form-affiliation flag. A result may strengthen a source-family description, close a directionality question, or leave exact affiliation open. It does not add a secure quotation, remove one, or infer an authorial exemplar from Swete alone.
Focused modern research anchors
Ten material text-form/source-affiliation cases All R23 dispositions Open exact affiliation Strengthened source-family diagnosis Closed directionality question
Record NT unit OT witness R22 condition R23 disposition Source-family result Controlled next action Research anchor
R23 historical coverage: 10/59 P1 records (16.9%). R24 subsequently reviewed the 33 witness-condition records, two of which overlap R23, bringing the pre-R25 cumulative union to 41/59 . R25 now adjudicates the final 18 composite-source/form-only records . Original R22 flags remain visible for provenance.
P1 Witness/Transcription Triage II · R24 Export triage JSON Export triage CSV
Witness problem ≠ textual problem. R24 reviews exactly the 33 R22 P1 records carrying witness-condition. It separates recoverable digital transcription and reference-mapping conditions from genuine source-form or NT textual-surface questions. Closing a witness flag never erases a real quotation-form difference, and keeping a source-form question open never lowers the underlying secure quotation/reuse grade.
Disposition / condition taxonomy
Focused research and edition controls
Thirty-three witness-condition cases All R24 dispositions Closed witness condition Open source-form question Retained citational adaptation NT textual-surface condition All condition classes Digital / transcription Reference / versification Diagnostic embedding Text history Source form Citational adaptation NT textual surface
Record NT unit OT witness Condition class R22 witness condition R24 disposition Witness result / next action Research control
R24 handoff. R23 reviewed 10 material text-form records and R24 reviewed 33 witness-condition records, with 2 records overlapping both tranches. The resulting 41/59 unique P1 union left exactly 18 composite-source/form-only cases ; R25 adjudicates those cases in the next workbench section.
P1 Composite Source/Form Triage III · R25 Export triage JSON Export triage CSV
Composite ≠ vague resemblance. R25 reviews exactly the 18 P1 records left after R23/R24. A genuine composite must preserve distinguishable source contributions; a single-source compression or serial legal list is refined rather than left under an overbroad composite label. R25 completes controlled triage of all 59 P1 records without adding a single secure OT record or changing a secure quotation/reuse grade.
Disposition taxonomy
Focused modern research anchors
Eighteen remaining composite-source/form P1 cases All R25 dispositions Retain genuine composite Strengthen architecture Refine overbroad composite label Open source identification All architecture classes
Record NT unit OT witness Architecture R22 condition R25 disposition Source result / controlled action Research anchor
P1 triage queue closed. R23 reviewed the 10 material text-form records; R24 reviewed the 33 witness-condition records (2 overlapping R23); R25 reviews the 18 remaining composite-source/form-only records. The union is now 59/59 unique P1 records , with 0 untriaged P1 records . This is an editorial triage closure, not a claim that every source-critical question is solved: Acts 3:22–23 remains explicitly open, and open source-form questions retained in R23/R24 remain visible in their own layers.
P2 Claim-Boundary Triage I · Unmarked Quotations · R26 Export triage JSON Export triage CSV
No formula ≠ no quotation. R26 reviews exactly the 43 P2 records whose R22 diagnostic is quotation-without-explicit-frame. The operative question is whether quotation intent is otherwise established by contextual framing, speech/liturgical setting, or distinctive verbal correspondence. The original R22 flag remains visible for provenance; R26 does not alter the secure quotation registry automatically.
Signal taxonomy
Methodological / focused research anchors
Forty-three quotation-without-explicit-frame cases All R26 dispositions Closed formula-absence flag Retained boundary-sensitive terminology All signal classes
Record NT unit OT witness Signal class R22 framing note R26 disposition Sequence evidence Controlled action Research anchor
R27 handoff. R26 resolves the formula-absence question for all 43 records in this tranche: 42 CLOSED and 1 RETAINED as boundary-sensitive terminology (Mark 4:12) . The remaining P2 queue is exactly 22 verbal-reuse-boundary records . P1 remains closed at 59/59 unique records.
P2 Verbal-Reuse Boundary Triage II · R27 Export triage JSON Export triage CSV
Boundary closure without claim inflation. R27 reviews exactly the 22 R26 handoff records carrying verbal-reuse-boundary. It distinguishes explicit/paraphrastic citation, embedded scriptural speech, sustained source incorporation, formula-less scriptural maxims, and a source-parallel witness. Earlier registry claim types are preserved for provenance and backward compatibility.
Boundary taxonomy
Focused research anchors
Final twenty-two P2 reuse-boundary cases All R27 dispositions Strengthen citation-level Retain verbal reuse Refine source witness All boundary classes
Record NT unit OT witness Boundary class R22 note R27 disposition Controlled action Research anchor
P2 triage queue closed. R26 reviewed 43 quotation-without-explicit-frame records and R27 reviews the remaining 22 verbal-reuse-boundary records. The union is now 65/65 P2 records , with 0 untriaged P2 records . Together with the completed 59/59 P1 queue, the R22 modern-critical attention queue is fully triaged at the editorial QA level. Open source/text questions retained by earlier stages remain open; triage closure is not scholarly omniscience.
Scholarly Consolidation / Release-Readiness Audit · R28 Export release JSON Export exceptions CSV
Research RC ready; scholarly-final label on hold. R28 adds no claims. It distinguishes complete editorial triage from unresolved scholarship and publication-grade validation. The principal hold is the 24-record R12 allusion/echo tranche, whose own interface still states that independent bibliography/peer-review validation is pending.
Release gates
Open / controlled exception ledger All release classes Open source/text form Open composite source Controlled NT surface Controlled terminology All stages R23 R24 R25 R26
Record NT unit OT witness Release class Stages Consolidated disposition Next action
Effective claim-boundary overlay This release overlay records R26/R27 boundary conclusions without rewriting the legacy R10–R21 registry. It is the preferred interpretive classification for release display while provenance remains intact.
Record NT unit OT witness Legacy claim R28 effective boundary Policy
Bibliography / link hygiene Anchor Current condition Preferred release source Priority Action
Web-verified preferred research anchors
R22–R28 consolidation
Release semantics. “124/124 triaged” means every automated R22 attention flag has an editorial disposition. It does not mean that every possible NT use of Scripture is exhausted or that every exact Vorlage is known. R29 has now completed bibliography-backed validation of the 24 allusion/echo records; that later validation is kept in a separate overlay rather than rewriting the historical R28 stage.
Independent allusion / echo scholarly validation · R29 Export validation JSON Export validation CSV
Fixed-corpus validation, not registry expansion. R29 independently checks all 24 historical R12 allusion/echo records against modern scholarship. The original R12 claimType and six-factor score remain preserved for provenance. R29 supplies an effective classification where independent research shows that a relation is better described as citation-level reuse or explicit scriptural/narrative reperformance rather than a hidden allusion.
Methodological controls
Validated 24-record registry All validation dispositions Confirm Strengthen Refine All effective classes
Record NT unit OT witness R12 grade / score R29 disposition R29 effective classification Validation note Research anchors
Independent research anchors
R12 validation backlog closed. All 24 historical records now have an independent bibliography-backed disposition. This closes the R28 allusion/echo validation hold, but it does not convert the complete concordance into an externally peer-reviewed final edition: 11 source/text-form questions and two controlled exceptions remain disclosed, and publication-grade bibliography/apparatus review remains separate.
Open scholarly questions resolution · R30 Export resolution JSON Export resolution CSV
Bounded resolution, not false certainty. R30 re-examines the 11 source/text-form questions left open by R28/R29. Seven can be closed at research-release level because modern scholarship sufficiently identifies the source locus, source family, or adaptive mechanism. Four remain genuinely disputed. “Resolved” never means that an unattested physical exemplar has been reconstructed.
Eleven-case resolution registry All R30 dispositions Resolved Resolved · bounded Partial · attribution open Open
Record NT unit OT/source R28 open question R30 status Effective resolution R30 disposition Remaining caution Research anchors
Research anchors
Four questions remain genuinely open after R30. Release impact. The open source/text-form ledger falls from 11 to 4 . R12 validation remains 24/24 complete and the automated P1/P2 queue remains 124/124 triaged. R31 now supplies the publication-facing bibliography/apparatus normalization while preserving these R30 dispositions unchanged.
Publication apparatus & bibliography normalization · R31 Export bibliography JSON Export bibliography CSV Export source crosswalk
Publication normalization, not external peer review. R31 consolidates the R22–R30 research anchors into one canonical bibliography, removes non-preferred reader-facing links, separates scholarly authorities from auxiliary controls, and preserves every historical source ID through a legacy crosswalk. It does not alter any Scripture-use claim.
Reader-facing citation policy
Four genuinely open questions + two controlled exceptions
Canonical bibliography All authority tiers A · academic / peer-reviewed B · scholarly / institutional C · auxiliary / discovery Control only All publication types
Bib ID Normalized citation Type Authority Canonical link Legacy source IDs Stages Publication note
Bibliography hygiene closure
Legacy source-ID → canonical bibliography crosswalk Legacy source ID Canonical Bib ID Appears in
Research-stage provenance retained
Release label. R31 is a research release candidate with a normalized publication apparatus . It is not labeled externally peer reviewed. Four substantive source/attribution questions and two controlled exceptions remain disclosed, and the full R22–R30 QA history remains available in this workbench and in exports.
Probable allusions & scriptural echoes Export JSON Export CSV
Evidence screen. Six factors are scored 0–2: verbal correspondence, distinctive image/phrase, contextual fit, source salience, author/work recurrence, and explanatory coherence. Totals are editorial evidence scores—not probabilities. Scores 10–12 meeting the distinctive-marker gate are labeled probable allusion ; 7–9 are strong scriptural echo . Direct quotation, explicit citation, and literary dependence remain false for every record in this registry.
R12 contains 24 source-checked allusion/echo records: 20 probable allusions and 4 strong echoes. Historical R12 status: the original registry recorded independent bibliography/peer-review validation as pending. R29 now supplies a separate 24/24 bibliography-backed validation overlay above; the R12 fields are intentionally preserved unchanged for provenance.
NT passage OT witness Grade / evidence score GTM NT excerpt Swete comparison witness Sequence evidence / editorial note
Intertext clusters / multi-source units Export JSON Export CSV
Claim discipline. R22 retains the cluster model and groups the secure quotation corpus alongside the separate R12 allusion/echo records. The cluster is a structural/editorial synthesis; every member keeps its original claim grade, witness text, and textual-affiliation limits. “Composite imagery” is not automatically a composite quotation.
Cluster / NT unit Classification Member sources Claim policy Editorial basis
Repeated OT source hubs Export JSON Export CSV
A reuse hub reverses the normal direction of the concordance: it begins with one OT locus and shows multiple NT uses. A hub does not assert NT-to-NT literary dependence or identical rhetorical function.
OT source hub NT uses Claim limits Editorial note
Local discovery triage Export triage Clear local triage
Shortlisting or dismissing a machine candidate is stored only in this browser. It never promotes a candidate into the curated registry.